Water, water, everywhere — not a time to blink. A flood over politics, policy, farmers, generators, multinationals, iwi. Sometimes John Key looks as if he is pushing water uphill.
Last week’s spillway: the cabinet’s manoeuvre on the Waitangi Tribunal’s report; the Maori King’s summoning of a hui; the Maori Council’s musing on a court challenge; Ngati Kahungungu’s tabling of a claim for rivers and aquifers in its rohe; the Environment Court’s clearance of Manawatu region’s tough “one plan” to clean its river; reappointment of commissioners to run Canterbury’s water; another round on Rio Tinto’s Manapouri play.
Author: Colin James
Enigma variations
China Symposium, 5 September 2012
What an RR combo might mean for us
Yet another academic is prophesying gloom for the United States. A new paper by Robert Gordon picks up a theme that GDP-enhancing new science and technology has thinned over the past half-century and future consumption growth will therefore be slower.
Instead of the material standard of living doubling every 30 years or so as it did from 1930 to 1990, doubling will slow to 100 years, the nineteenth century pace, Gordon says.
A watery grave or water under the bridge?
This month is the deadline for the Land and Water Forum to finalise consensus on water management. A lot hangs on this.
The forum is a policymaking experiment in “collaborative governance”, a variant on a Scandinavian technique used to resolve complex policy conundrums. At issue is whether this will be New Zealand’s one and only attempt.
The Treaty, poverty, inequality and cohesion
The big news last week was the Waitangi Tribunal’s demand asset sales be delayed till a framework for dealing with iwi water claims is sorted. The deeper news was in two reports on inequalities, with two followups due this week.
The asset sales poser is soluble. It is part of the adjustment of law, administration and politics to the revival of the Treaty of Waitangi and our bicultural experiment which assigns equality to two deeply different cultures.
Voodoo or orthodox — take your pick
There is nothing like an idea for which the time has come — or come again. Take voodoo economics.
Steven Joyce on The Nation at the weekend used the term to scoff at Labour party ideas to constrain the exchange rate. The irony was that the originator of the phrase, George Bush senior, applied it to some of the very policies Joyce defends as orthodox.
Politicians come and go. And our freedoms too?
National’s problem next election is support. That qualifies its recent lift in the polls, which in any case coincides with its protracted standoff with the Maori Council and the Waitangi Tribunal over water (very faint echoes of Don Brash).
ACT is all but dismantled. Peter Dunne is down to one uncertain seat. The Maori party is over-dependent on its two co-leaders who have said they want to retire and say the party voted against National more often than did Labour in 2008-11. Colin Craig is presentable and definable but National has yet to work out if it wants him and, if so, how he is to get seats (a 4 per cent threshold might help — but it would also help Winston Peters).
Good cause for optimism: 1912 and 2012
Good cause for optimism: 1912 and 2012
IPANZ Young Professionals Conference, 9 August 2012
Is "partnership" the only route to school innovation?
So there is to be a “small number” of “partnership schools”. More than the original four, that suggests. And of quite a variety. Is that good, bad or irrelevant?
The motivation for these adaptations of American “charter” schools is ideological. ACT says the market will do better for kids because parents will choose the best schools for their kids.
Rethinking how to do government post–GFC
It’s five years from the first stutterings that turned into the global financial crisis — time enough for governments to have stopped treating symptoms and hoping for the best. The world is not going back to old business-as-usual. Some think it is time to rethink how governments operate.
After the 1929 crash and subsequent depression governments took to planning, which gave us social security and the mixed economy. After the 1973 oil crisis and collapse of the Bretton Woods system, governments ditched planning as futile in favour of “more-market” economies which were assumed to tend always to equilibrium.